Confirmation of the Theory of Invariable
Time-Intervals
Robert Howard Kroepel
Copyright © 2004
New Durham, NH USA 03855
PageLinks
The Concept and
Principle of Infinity and The Infinite
The Concept of the Universe
The Three Realities
Which Comprise The Universe
1. The Spatial Reality
2. The Temporal Reality
3. The Physical Reality
The Theory of
Invariable Time-Intervals (TITI
The Operational
Definition of Time (TITI)
The Unit of Measurement of
Time: The Time-Interval (TI)
The Continuum of Time
The Two Types of
Time-Intervals (TIs)
The 1971 Hafele-Keating
Experiment
The Philosophical Concepts
and Principles of Physics Changed by the TITI
Absolute Time (AT) and
Absolute Space (AS)
Absolute Rest (AR),
the Absolute Rest Reference Frame (ARRF), and Absolute Motion (AM)
Simultaneity
The Criteria for Proof of the
Confirmation of the TITI
Confirmation of the TITI
The US GPS Nav System
The 1971 Hafele-Keating
Experiment
Radio Clocks
Summary
The
Concept and Principle of Infinity and The Infinite
To PageLinks
Infinity is operationally defined as having no physical or
mathematical limits.
That which is infinite has no physical or mathematical limits.
Finity is operationally defined as having physical or/and
mathematical limits.
That which is finite has physical or/and mathematical limits.
To PageLinks
The
Concept
of the Universe
To PageLinks
The universe is operationally defined to be all reality,
all there is, all that exists as reality, all that exists combined in
a single actuality.
There exists one and only one universe.
Any claim of multiple or parallel universes is denied
by the fact that there is one and only one universe which contains all
there is, including additional 'universes.'
To PageLinks
The
Three Realities Which Comprise The Universe
To PageLinks
The universe is comprised of three realities:
1. The Spatial Reality—Space:
The infinite/unbounded volume within which exist time and physics
(matter/energy, m/e).
Intuitable by the expression x + i wherein x is a volume
of finite radius/diameter, and x-volume, and i is a surrounding
infinite volume, the i-volume.
The principle is that any finite x-volume can be surrounded by the
infinite i-volume. The result is that there is no limit to the volume
of the universe which is space.
Space is thus infinite in volume and duration. It cannot be created,
nor can it be destroyed.
If space were devoid of time and physics (matter/energy), then its
volume would be a pure vacuum.
2. The Temporal Reality—Time:
The sequence of events measurable by time-intervals—the history of the
universe.
Time is operationally defined as the use of time-intervals
as units of measurement for the measurement of the
occurrences, durations and simultaneities of
events.
Time is infinite in duration.
By the use of time-intervals as units of measurement for the
measurement of time, time can be counted without mathematical limits
forwards into the future or backwards into the past.
To PageLinks
The Continuum of Time
The Continuum of Time is infinite:
Past Infinity<- ... <- (T-2) <- (T-1) <- T0 (Origin) ->
(T+1) -> (T+2) -> ... -> Future Infinity
T0 = Timepoint of Origin, 0, where time is begun to be
counted by observers including organisms and machines (computers).
To PageLinks
3. The Physical
Reality—Physics: The Matter/Energy (M/E) of the Universe.
Matter/energy (m/e) is infinite in duration, confirmed by experiments
which have confirmed the conservation of matter, the conservation of
energy (and the electric charge, and momentum), and by experiments
which
have confirmed e = mc2 and m = e/c2.
The m/e of the universe—the physical reality–is a closed m/e system
because m/e cannot be added to it (where would the additional m/e come
from?) and m/e cannot be removed from it (where would the removed m/e
go?).
The presence of m/e in an area of space causes that area to not
be a pure vacuum.
Causality is the phenomena wherein people/objects/events
who/which are comprised of m/e and are causes causing/creating
people/objects/events who/which are comprised of m/e and are effects.
Causality is thus causes causing effects.
The infinite duration of m/e proves that there was never a cause of
causality but, instead, m/e is the source of causality, the
source of causes causing effects.
The infinite duration of m/e but also the infinite duration of space
considered together prove that prior to any Big Bangs there existed
space and m/e within space and after any Big Crunches there existed
space and m/e within space.
Thus, there never was a beginning to space, time and physics (m/e), nor
will there be an ending to space, time and physics.
"To be perfectly honest, neither scientists nor
philosophers really
know what time is or why it exists. The best thing they can say is that
time
is an extra dimension akin (but not identical) to space. ..."
Paul Davies, That Mysterious Flow, Scientific American,
Special Edition: A Matter of Time, September, 2002, p. 41.
To PageLinks
The
Theory of Invariable Time-Intervals (TITI)
To PageLinks
The Theory of Invariable Time-Intervals (TITI) is a theory of
time.
The TITI is a theory of the use of a unit of measurement called
a time-interval for the measurement of time by the measurement of the
occurrences of events in sequences of events.
The TITI will change many but not all philosophical concepts/principles
of modern physics.
To PageLinks
The
Operational Definition of Time (T)
To PageLinks
In the TITI, time is operationally defined as the use of time-intervals
(TIs) as units of measurement for the measurement of the occurrences
of events in sequences of events.
The
Unit of Measurement of Time: The Time-Interval (TI)
To PageLinks
The essence of time, of time-measurement, is the time-interval,
which is the unit of measurement of time.
The time-interval is a duration, a duration of time, between a
beginning and an ending of a cycle, between the beginning and the
ending of a regularly recurring periodic motion or physical cycle.
Once a time-interval is abstracted—once its duration is abstracted—from
its original cycle/periodic motion, the time-interval's duration is
independent of the original cycle/periodic motion; thus, if the
original cycle/periodic motion changes, the change will not affect the
abstracted time-interval.
To PageLinks
The
Two
Types of Time-Intervals (TIs)
To PageLinks
Two types of TIs/time-intervals have been identified:
1. the variable time-interval
(VTI);
2. the invariable time-interval (ITI).
VTIs are found in variable time-interval clocks (VTICs) whose rates of
operation (RoOs) are affected by changes of velocity (speed and motion)
and/or gravity (which creates a force field which changes or otherwise
can change the velocity of objects within it); acceleration causes a
decrease in the RoO of a VTIC and therefore a decrease/shortening of
the duration of its VTI while deceleration causes an increase in its
RoO and therefore a increase/lengthening of the duration of its VTI.
ITIs are found in invariable time-interval clocks (ITICs) whose
RoOs are affected by changes of velocity and/or gravity but whose RoOs
(A) are adjusted internally by a motion-sensing and self-adjusting
mechanism and relevant computer (these ITICs are referred to as
motion-sensing/self-adjusting invariable time-interval clocks, or
MASSITICs) or (B) are adjusted externally by radio signals from a
master clock (the master invariable time-interval clock is referred to
as an MITIC while the radio-controlled invariable time-interval
clocks—the slave clocks whose RoO/TI/ITI/timing is controlled by the
MITIC—are referred to as slave invariable time-interval clocks or
SITICs) with the result that the TI/ITI in ITICs is essentially and
effectively a constant duration and the ITICs' RoO likewise is
essentially and effective constant and therefore invariable.
To PageLinks
The
1971 Hafele-Keating Experiment
To PageLinks
The 1971 Hafele-Keating experiment ...
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.htm
... explains how ITICs can be confirmed to be a reality.
"During October, 1971, four cesium
atomic beam clocks were flown on regularly scheduled commercial jet
flights around the world twice, once eastward and once westward, to
test Einstein's theory of relativity with macroscopic clocks. From the
actual flight paths of each trip, the theory predicted that the flying
clocks, compared with reference clocks at the U.S. Naval Observatory,
should have lost 40+/-23 nanoseconds during the eastward trip and
should have gained 275+/-21 nanoseconds during the westward trip ...
Relative to the atomic time scale of the U.S. Naval Observatory, the
flying clocks lost 59+/-10 nanoseconds during the eastward trip and
gained 273+/-7 nanosecond during the westward trip, where the errors
are the corresponding standard deviations. These results provide an
unambiguous empirical resolution of the famous clock "paradox" with
macroscopic clocks."
J.C. Hafele and R. E. Keating, Science 177, 166 (1972)
In the Hafele-Keating experiment, three sets of atomic clocks were
synchronized (time-coordinated) and all were therefore using the same
time-interval [TI].
One set of clocks was placed aboard a westbound jet airliner, another
set was placed aboard an eastbound set airliner, and thus both sets of
airborne clocks were accelerated and decelerated during the normal
flight routines of the airliners and then returned to the Earth, where
their readouts (time counts/time measurements) were compared to the
readouts of the clocks which remained on Earth.
In this experiment, the Earth was one reference frame, and the
airliner, because of its acceleration and altitude, was another
reference frame, in analogy with Einstein's gedankenexperiment (thought
experiment/intuition) in which a railway embankment was one reference
frame and a moving railway carriage was another reference frame (see
Relativity. by Albert Einstein, pp. 17-25):
Earth = Railway Embankment [K Reference Frame]
Airliner = Railway Carriage [K' Reference Frame]
When the readouts of the accelerated airborne clocks were compared to
the readouts of the non-accelerated Earth-bound clocks, the accelerated
airborne clocks' readouts were uniformly lesser than the
non-accelerated Earth-bound clocks' readouts, an indication that time
had been dilated, and a confirmation of relativity, which predicted
time-dilation for accelerated/decelerated clocks.
We note that the determination of time-dilation is conducted in
the originating reference frame and not by any method whereby observers
in one reference frame observe objects/events in another reference
frame.
By the use of the single originating reference frame Lorentz
relativistic
transformation problems (disagreements of time and length measurements
by observers in different inertial reference frames) are eliminated.
The clocks used for the Hafele-Keating experiment were clocks whose
time-intervals (TIs) were variable time-intervals (VTIs) thus the
clocks themselves were variable time-interval clocks (VTICs) whose
time-intervals were variable in duration, in time, when subjected to
changes of velocity (speed and direction) and/or gravity. When the
air-borne VTICs were accelerated, their TIs/VTIs were lengthened, their
RoOs were slowed, and their counting of TIs/VTIs was decreased, their
readouts/time counts/time-measurements decreased, with the result that
their readouts were less than the readouts/time
counts/time-measurements of the Earth-bound/non-accelerated VTICs.
If invariable time-interval clocks (ITICs—either MSSAITICs or MITICs
controlling SITICs) were used in a replication of the Hafele-Keating
experiment, then the prediction is that upon their return to the Earth
the airborne accelerated ITICs would show the same/identical readouts
as the non-accelerated Earth-bound ITICs, and, thus, time would not be
dilated.
Again, the use of the single originating reference frame eliminates the
Lorentz relativistic transformation problems.
To PageLinks
The
Philosophical Concepts and Principles of Physics Changed by the TITI
To PageLinks
With the confirmation of the TITI the philosophical concepts/principles
of absolute time (AT)/universal time (UT), absolute space (AS),
absolute rest (AR), the absolute rest reference frame (ARRF), absolute
motion (AM), and simultaneity will be definable/specifiable and
therefore established as realities.
Absolute
Time (AT) and Absolute Space (AS)
To PageLinks
The TIs/ITIs in ITICs produce absolute time (AT), or universal time
(UT) wherein from the originating reference frame, K, time, t, is the
same for all other reference frames, K', K'', K''', etc.; thus for K,
K', K'', K''', etc., t = t' = t'' = t''' ... etc. When AT/UT is
established,
time becomes independent of space, and space, likewise, becomes
independent of time, and, therefore, space becomes absolute space (AS).
Albert Einstein, Relativity, Chapter IX:
"Now before the advent of the theory of relativity it had always
tacitly been assumed in physics that the statement of time had an
absolute significance, i.e. that it is independent of the state of
motion of the body of reference." [p. 27]
We note that for a clock to measure absolute time it must be
"independent of the state of motion of [its] body of reference."
The TIs, rates of ticking (RoT), timepoints and timelines of ITICs are
adjusted to compensate for the affects on TIs, RoTs, timepoints, and
timelines of VTICs caused by accelerations and decelerations, therefore
ITICs are "independent of the state of motion of [their bodies] of
reference."
Any ITIC is therefore "independent of the state of motion of [its] body
of reference" and is therefore measuring absolute time and is not
measuring local time within its "body of reference."
Absolute Rest
(AR),
the Absolute Rest Reference Frame (ARRF), and Absolute Motion (AM)
To PageLinks
If a VTIC is linked to an ITIC, in what will be referred to as a
VTIC/ITIC combo, and while Earth-bound/non-accelerated
(non-decelerated) the TIs are synchronized, so VTI = ITI, the VTIC/ITIC
combo produces a clock mechanism which can be used to detect absolute
rest (AR), the absolute rest reference frame (ARRF), and absolute
motion (AM).
If the spacecraft containing a VTIC/ITIC combo is launched into
space, and, disregarding the effects of gravity, a force is applied 180
degrees opposite the direction of motion of the spacecraft, the
spacecraft
with the VTIC/ITIC combo will decelerate, its velocity (speed and
direction) will become temporarily zero (no motion = no speed and no
direction), hence its AM will be zero, it will be at AR, and it will
have entered the ARRF, and if the force is continued, then the
spacecraft will accelerate in the direction 180 degrees opposite its
original direction.
During these transition phases, the RoO of the VTIC in the VTIC/ITIC
combo will change from its original non-accelerated (non-decelerated)
RoO in the Earth's reference frame to a maximum RoO at AR in the ARRF
when
its AM is zero while the RoO of the ITIC will remain constant.
Thus, the maximum RoO of any machine or organism will be achieved at AM
= zero at AR in the ARRF.
Observers on the Earth will observe the RoO of the VTIC to increase
with deceleration to a maximum and then to decrease with acceleration
in the opposite direction while the RoO of the ITIC remains constant.
Observers on the spacecraft, whose RoOs will vary directly with
the RoO of the VTIC, will observe the RoO of the VTIC to remain
constant
while the RoO of the ITIC will increase with acceleration to a maximum
at AM = zero at AR in the ARRF and then to decrease with acceleration
in the opposite direction.
We know that the RoO of any machine or organism should be zero at the
speed of light (SOL/186,000 mps).
Between a maximum RoO at AM = zero at AR in the ARRF and the minimum
RoO/RoO = zero at the SOL we have a calibratable cosmic speedometer
which can be used to determine the AM, the absolute motion, of a
spacecraft equipped with a VTIC/ITIC combo.
When the AM = the AM of the Earth's reference frame, the VTIC's
RoO = the ITIC's RoO for both Earth-bound/non-accelerated observers and
the space-borne/accelerated observers.
Whether Earth-bound/non-accelerated or space-borne/accelerated,
observers can use the difference of RoOs between the VTIC and the ITIC
of a VTIC/ITIC combo to determine the AM of the spacecraft.
To PageLinks
Simultaneity
To PageLinks
Simultaneity is established (A) when invariable time-intervals (ITIs)
are used in ITICs to measure time and (B) when two (or more) events can
be determined to have occurred at the same timepoint.
Earth-bound/non-accelerated observers can keep track of VTIC/ITIC
combos in other reference frames (either aboard accelerated/decelerated
spacecraft or on astronomical objects) and if the distance from a
VTIC/ITIC combo to an event is known and as short as possible, then
radio telemetry can be used to radio information inre: the ITIC
timepoint at which an event occurred in its reference frame and this
information can be compared to information inre: the ITIC timepoints at
which other events occurred, and concurrence of ITIC timepoints will
operationally define simultaneity—events occurring at the same ITIC
timepoints will be simultaneous.
Events occurring at other ITIC timepoints will not be simultaneous.
Observers not in the Earth's reference frame can be directed to
use the ITIC timepoints generated by the ITIC of their local VTIC/ITIC
combo—the VTIC/ITIC combo within their reference frame for
simultaneity/non-simultaneity; those events occurring at the same ITIC
timepoints will thus be simultaneous with all other events occurring at
the same ITIC timepoints.
At all AMs not equal to the AM of the originating reference frame there
will be a RoO difference and therefore a difference of timepoints
between the VTIC RoO/timepoints and the ITIC RoO/timepoints.
Earth-bound observers will observe the ITIC RoO to be constant in any
reference frame and the ITIC timepoints to be useable for
simultaneity/non-simultaneity of events in different reference frames;
space-borne observers who have AMs different from the Earth's AM will
observe their local VTIC RoO to be constant, but, nevertheless,
although they will observe their ITIC RoO to change they will also
observe the ITIC to generate its own set of timepoints which they can
use to relate events, and, thus, any events occurring at the same ITIC
timepoints within their own reference frame will be simultaneous and
all events occurring at the same ITIC timepoints in any other reference
frames will also be simultaneous.
To PageLinks
The
Criteria for Proof of the Confirmation of the TITI
To PageLinks
One of the criterion for the confirmation of the Theory of Invariable
Time-Intervals (ITI) will be the actual use of invariable
time-intervals (ITIs) in invariable time-interval clocks (ITICs) of
either Design A/Type A motion-sensing/self-adjusting invariable
time-interval clocks (MSSAITICs) which are internally controlled and
self-correcting or Design B/Type
B radio-controlled invariable time-interval clocks (SITICs) which are
externally controlled by radio signals/telemetry from master invariable
time-interval clocks (MITICs).
Prediction: Design A/Type A MSSAITICs or/and Design B/Type B SITICs
controlled by MITICs will be used for time control in spacecraft and
satellites including the Global Positioning System (GPS).
To PageLinks
Confirmation
of the TITI
The US GPS Nav System
To PageLinks
Confirmation: Navstar GPS User Equipment Introduction.
(September 1996, Public Release Version)
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
CHAPTER 1: SYSTEM OVERVIEW
1.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The Navstar Global Positioning System (GPS) is a space-based
radio-positioning and time-transfer system. GPS provides accurate
position, velocity, and time (PVT) information to an unlimited number
of suitably equipped ground, sea, air and space users. Passive PVT
fixes are available world-wide in all-weathers in a world-wide common
grid system. Normally GPS contains features which limit the full
accuracy of the service only to authorized users and protection from
spoofing (hostile imitation). GPS comprises three major
system segments, Space, Control, and User ... .
The Space Segment consists of a nominal constellation of 24 Navstar
satellites. Each satellite broadcasts RF ranging codes and a navigation
data message. The Control Segment consists of a network of monitoring
and control facilities which are used to manage the satellite
constellation and update the satellite navigation data messages. The
User Segment consists of a variety of radio navigation receivers
specifically designed to receive, decode, and process the GPS satellite
ranging codes and navigation data messages. The Space, Control, and
User Segments are described in more
detail in paragraph 1.2.
The ranging codes broadcast by the satellites enable a GPS receiver to
measure the transit time of the signals and thereby determine the
range between each satellite and the receiver. The navigation data
message
enables a receiver to calculate the position of each satellite at the
time the signals were transmitted. The receiver then uses this
information
to determine its own position, performing calculations similar to those
performed by other distance-measuring navigation equipment.
Conceptually,
each range measurement defines a sphere centered on a satellite. The
common
intersection point of the spheres on or near the earth's surface
defines
the receiver position.
For GPS positioning, a minimum of four satellites are normally required
to be simultaneously "in view" of the receiver, thus providing four
range measurements. This enables the receiver to calculate the three
unknown parameters representing its (3-D) position, as well as a fourth
parameter representing the user clock error. Treating the user clock
error as an
unknown enables most receivers to be built with an inexpensive crystal
oscillator rather than an expensive precision oscillator or atomic
clock.
Precise time estimates are required for precise positioning, since a
time
error of 3 nanoseconds is roughly equivalent to a range error of 1
metre.
Less than four satellites can be used by a receiver if time or altitude
is precisely known or if these parameters are available from an
external
source. A more detailed explanation of the GPS theory of operation is
provided
in paragraph 1.4.
The satellites transmit ranging signals on two D-band frequencies: Link
1 (Ll ) at 1575.42 MHz and Link 2 (L2) at 1227.6 MHz. The satellite
signals are transmitted using spread-spectrum techniques, employing two
different ranging codes as spreading fictions, a 1.023 MHz
coarse/acquisition code (C/A-code) on L1 and a 10.23 MHz precision code
(P-code) on both L1 and L2. Either the C/A-code or the P-code can be
used to determine the range between the satellite and the user,
however, the P-code is normally encrypted and available only to
authorized users. When encrypted, the P-code is known as the Y-code. A
50 Hz navigation message is superimposed on both the P(Y)-code and the
C/A-code. The navigation message includes satellite clock-bias data,
satellite ephemeris (precise orbital) data for the transmitting
satellite, ionospheric signal-propagation correction data, and
satellite almanac
(coarse orbital) data for the entire constellation. Refer to paragraph
1.4 for additional details regarding the ranging codes and navigation
message.
1.2.2 Control Segment
The Control Segment primarily consists of a Master Control Station
(MCS), at Falcon Air Force Base (AFB) in Colorado Springs, USA, plus
monitor stations (MS) and ground antennas (GA) at various locations
around the
world. The monitor stations are located at Falcon AFB, Hawaii,
Kwajalein, Diego Garcia, and Ascension. All monitor stations except
Hawaii and Falcon AFB are also equipped with ground antennas (see
Figure 1-3). The Control Segment includes a Prelaunch Compatibility
Station (PCS) located at Cape Canaveral, USA, and a back-up MCS
capability.
The MCS is the central processing facility for the Control Segment and
is responsible for monitoring and managing the satellite constellation.
The MCS functions include control of satellite station-keeping
maneuvers, reconfiguration of redundant satellite equipment, regularly
updating the navigation messages transmitted by the satellites, and
various other satellite health monitoring and maintenance activities.
The monitor stations passively track all GPS satellites in view,
collecting ranging data from each satellite. This information is
transmitted to the MCS where the satellite ephemeris and clock
parameters are estimated and predicted. The MCS uses the ground
antennas to periodically upload the ephemeris and clock data to each
satellite for retransmission in the navigation message. Communications
between the MCS the MS and GA are typically accomplished via the U.S.
Defense Satellite Communication System (DSCS). The navigation message
update function is graphically depicted in Figure 1-4.
The PCS primarily operates under control of the MCS to support
prelaunch compatibility testing of GPS satellites via a cable
interface. The PCS also includes an RF transmit/receive capability that
can serve as a Control Segment ground antenna, if necessary. The U.S.
Air Force Satellite Control Network (AFSCN) consists of a multipurpose
worldwide network of ground- and space-based satellite control
facilities. Various AFSCN resources are available to support GPS but
are not dedicated exclusively to GPS.
1.2.3 User Segment
The User Segment consists of receivers specifically designed to
receive, decode, and process the GPS satellite signals. Receivers can
be stand-alone, integrated with or embedded into other systems. GPS
receivers
can vary significantly in design and function, depending on their
application
for navigation, accurate positioning, time transfer, surveying and
attitude reference.
Chapter 2 provides a general description of GPS receiver types and
intended applications.
1.3 GPS SERVICES
Two levels of service are provided by the GPS, the Precise Positioning
Service (PPS) and the Standard Positioning Service (SPS).
1.3.1 Precise Positioning Service
The PPS is an accurate positioning velocity and timing service which is
available only to authorized users. The PPS is primarily intended for
military purposes. Authorization to use the PPS is determined by the
U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), based on internal U.S. defense
requirements or international defense commitments. Authorized users of
the PPS include U.S. military users, NATO military users, and other
selected military and civilian users such as the Australian Defense
Forces and the U.S. Defense
Mapping Agency. The PPS is specified to provide 16 metres Spherical
Error
Probable (SEP) (3-D, 50%) positioning accuracy and 100 nanosecond (one
sigma) Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) time transfer accuracy to
authorized
users. This is approximately equal to 37 metres (3-D, 95%) and 197
nanoseconds
(95%) under typical system operating conditions. PPS receivers can
achieve
0.2 metres per second 3-D velocity accuracy, but this is somewhat
dependent on receiver design.
Access to the PPS is controlled by two features using cryptographic
techniques, Selective Availability (SA) and Anti-Spoofing (A-S). SA is
used to reduce GPS position, velocity, and time accuracy to the
unauthorized users. SA operates by introducing pseudorandom errors into
the satellite signals. The A-S feature is activated on all satellites
to negate potential spoofing of the ranging signals. The technique
encrypts the P-code into the Y-code. Users should note the C/A code is
not protected against spoofing.
Encryption keys and techniques are provided to PPS users which allow
them to remove the effects of SA and A-S and thereby attain the maximum
accuracy of GPS. PPS receivers that have not been loaded with a valid
cryptographic key will have the performance of an SPS receiver.
PPS receivers can use either the P(Y)-code or C/A-code or both.
Maximum GPS accuracy is obtained using the P(Y)-code on both L1 and L2.
P(Y)-code capable receivers commonly use the C/A-code to initially
acquire
GPS satellites.
1.3.2 Standard Positioning Service
The SPS is a less accurate positioning and timing service which
is available to all GPS users. In peacetime, the level of SA is
controlled to provide 100 metre (95%) horizontal accuracy which is
approximately equal to 156 metres 3D (95%). SPS receivers can achieve
approximately 337 nanosecond (95%) UTC time transfer accuracy. System
accuracy degradations can be
increased if it is necessary to do so, for example, to deny accuracy to
a potential enemy in time of crisis or war. Only the President of the
United States, acting through the U.S. National Command Authority, has
the authority to change the level of SA to other than peacetime levels.
The SPS is primarily intended for civilian purposes, although it has
potential peacetime military use. Refer to "Technical Characteristics
of the Navstar GPS" for additional details regarding SPS performance
characteristics.
1.4 GPS THEORY OF OPERATION
The ranging codes broadcast by the satellites enable a GPS receiver to
measure the transit time of the signals and thereby determine the
range between a satellite and the user. The navigation message provides
data to calculate the position of each satellite at the time of signal
transmission.
From this information, the user position coordinates and the user clock
offset are calculated using simultaneous equations. Four satellites are
normally required to be simultaneously "in view" of the receiver for
3-D positioning purposes. The following paragraphs give a description
of the GPS satellite signals and GPS receiver operation.
1.4.1 GPS Satellite Signals
1.4.1.1 C/A-Code
The C/A-code consists of a 1023 bit pseudorandom noise (PRN) code with
a clock rate of 1.023 MHz which repeats every 1 millisecond. The
short length of the C/A-code sequence is designed to enable a receiver
to rapidly acquire the satellite signals which helps the receiver
transition
to the longer P-code. A different PRN is assigned to each GPS satellite
and selected from a set of codes called Gold codes. The Gold codes are
designed
to minimize the probability that a receiver will mistake one code for
another
(minimize the cross-correlation). The C/A-code is transmitted only on
L1.
The C/A-code is not encrypted and is therefore available to all users
of GPS.
1.4.1.2 P(Y)-Code
The P-code is a 10.23 MHz PRN code sequence that is 267 days in
length. Each of the GPS satellites is assigned a unique seven-day
segment
of this code that restarts every Saturday/Sunday midnight GPS time (GPS
time is a continuous time scale maintained within 1 microsecond of UTC,
plus or minus a whole number of leap seconds). The P-code is normally
encrypted
into the Y-code to protect the user from spoofing. Since the satellites
have the capability to transmit either the P- or Y-code, it is often
referred to as the P(Y)-code. The P(Y)-code is transmitted by each
satellite on
both L1 and L2. On L1, the P(Y)-code is 90 degrees out of carrier phase
with the C/A-code.
1.4.1.3 Navigation Message
A 50 Hz navigation message is superimposed on both the P(Y) code and
the C/A-code. The navigation message includes data unique to the
transmitting satellite and data common to all satellites. The data
contains the time of transmission of the message, a Hand Over Word
(HOW) for the transition from C/A-code to P(Y)-code tracking, clock
correction, ephemeris, and
health data for the transmitting satellite, almanac and health data for
all satellites, coefficients for the ionospheric delay model, and
coefficients
to calculate UTC.
The navigation message consists of 25 frames of data, each frame
consisting of 1,500 bits. Each frame is divided into 5 subframes of 300
bits each (see Figure 1-5). At the 50 Hz transmission rate, it takes 6
seconds to receive a subframe, 30 seconds to receive one data frame,
and 12.5 minutes to receive all 25 frames. Subframes 1, 2, and 3 have
the same
data format for all 25 frames. This allows the receiver to obtain
critical
satellite-specific data within 30 seconds. Subframe 1 contains the
clock
correction for the transmitting satellite, as well as parameters
describing
the accuracy and health of the broadcast signal. Subframes 2 and 3
contain
ephemeris (precise orbital) parameters used to compute the location of
the satellite for the positioning equations.
...
1.4.2.2 Satellite Signal Acquisition
The satellite signal power at or near the earth's surface is less than
the receivers thermal (natural) noise level, due to the spread spectrum
modulation of the signal, orbital height and transmitting power of the
satellite. To extract the satellite signal the receiver uses code
correlation techniques. An internal replica of the incoming signal is
generated and aligned with the received satellite signal. The receiver
shifts the replica code to match the incoming code from the satellite.
When the codes match, the satellite signal is compressed back into the
original carrier frequency band. ...
The delay in the receiver's code is a measure of the transit time of
the signals between the satellite and the receiver's antenna and hence,
the range between the satellite position and receiver position. This
measurement is called a pseudorange measurement, rather than a range
measurement, because the receiver's clock bias has not been removed.
Receivers typically use phase-locked-loop techniques to synchronize the
receiver's internally generated code and carrier with the received
satellite signal. A code tracking loop is used to track the C/A- and
P-code signals while a carrier tracking loop is used to track the
carrier frequency. The two tracking loops work together in an
interactive process, aiding
each other, in order to acquire and track the satellite signals. ...
1.4.2.3 Down Conversion
The received RF signal is converted, usually through two intermediate
frequencies (IF), down to a frequency near the code baseband, that can
be sampled by an analogue to digital (A/D) converter. Inphase and
quadrature digital samples are taken to preserve the phase information
in the received signal. The samples are usually two bits to reduce
conversion losses.
The sampling rate must be higher than the code chipping rate for a non
return to zero code, that is, greater than 10.23 MHz for the P(Y)-code.
To ensure the phase of the received signal is maintained, all local
oscillators
are derived from, and phased locked through, a series of synthesizers
derived from the receiver's master oscillator. Following the A/D
conversion there is a final phase rotation circuit that enables the
doppler in the satellite signal to be precisely
tracked.
1.4.2.4 Code Tracking
The code tracking loop is used to make pseudorange measurements
between the GPS satellites and the GPS receiver. The receiver's code
tracking loop generates a replica of the C/A-code of the targeted
satellite.
The estimated doppler is removed by the phase rotation circuit prior to
the correlator.
In order to align the received signal with the internally generated
replica, the internally generated code is systematically slewed past
the received signal. Typically the output of the correlator is
integrated
over 1 to 10 ms. If correlation is not detected the phase of the
internally
generated code is advanced by one chip. If correlation is not detected
after
the whole code has been searched the doppler is adjusted and the
process
repeated until correlation is achieved. Code synchronization is
initially
maintained by also correlating the received signal with half chip early
and
late codes. A simple feedback system keeps the prompt ("on time") code
correctly
positioned. To extract the carrier which is still modulated by the
navigation
message, the prompt code is subtracted from the incoming signal. The
delay
that the receiver must add to the replica code to achieve
synchronization
(correlation), multiplied by the speed of light, is the pseudorange
measurement.
Once the carrier is reconstructed, the center frequency of the replica
code
is adjusted using Doppler measurements from the carrier tracking loop
to
achieve a precise frequency lock to the incoming signal, thereby
allowing
more precise pseudorange measurements. The bandwidth of the code
tracking
loop is typically 0.1 Hz, which implies that independent measurements
are
available at approximately 10 s intervals.
1.4.2.5 Carrier Tracking and Data Detection
The receiver tracks the satellite carrier by adjusting the frequency
synthesizers to produce a stationary phase at the output of the code
tracking loop. The inphase and quadrature components are used to
calculate the
carrier's phase and doppler. A data bit is detected by a sudden change
in the phase of the detected signal. The bandwidth of the carrier
tracking loop is typically 6 Hz for a military airborne receiver,
resulting in independent measurements being available every 150 ms.
Doppler is measured to provide an estimate of the relative velocity
between the receiver and the satellite. These measurements are
typically termed pseudorange rate measurements or they can be
integrated over regular time intervals to produce deltarange
measurements.
The receiver uses the doppler measurements from four (or more)
satellites to determine the receiver velocity (in three dimensions)
plus the receiver's master oscillator frequency bias. The deltarange
measurements of the carrier tracking loop are also used to aid the code
tracking loop to ensure code tracking is maintained during dynamic
maneuvers where the simple code
tracking system would be unable to maintain lock.
1.4.2.6 Data Demodulation
Once the carrier tracking loop is locked, the 50 Hz navigation data
message can be read. Each subframe of the navigation message begins
with a preamble contained in the Telemetry Word, enabling the receiver
to
detect the beginning of each subframe. Each subframe is identified by
bits contained in the Handover Word (HOW), enabling the receiver to
properly
decode the subframe data.
1.4.2.7 P(Y)-Code Signal Acquisition
The one millisecond C/A-code length permits a relatively narrow
search window for code correlation even if the receiver must "search
the sky" to find the first satellite. However the week long P(Y)-code
sequence at 10.23 MHz does not allow the same technique to be used.
Precise
time must be known by the receiver in order to start the code generator
within a few hundred chips of the correlation point of the incoming
signal.
The HOW contained in the GPS navigation message provides satellite time
and
hence the P(Y)-code phase information. A P(Y)-code receiver may attempt
to acquire the P(Y)-code directly, without first acquiring the
C/A-code,
if it has accurate knowledge of position, time and satellite ephemeris
from
a recent navigation solution. External aiding and/or an enhanced
acquisition
technique are usually required to perform direct P(Y)-code acquisition.
1.4.2.8 PVT Calculations
When the receiver has collected pseudorange measurements, deltarange
measurements, and navigation data from four (or more) satellites, it
calculates the navigation solution, PVT. Each navigation data message
contains precise orbital (ephemeris) parameters for the transmitting
satellite, enabling a receiver to calculate the position of each
satellite at the time the signals were transmitted. The ephemeris data
is normally valid and can
be used for precise navigation for a period of four hours following
issue
of a new data set by the satellite. New ephemeris data is transmitted
by the satellites every two hours.
As illustrated in Figure 1-10, the receiver solves a minimum of
four simultaneous pseudorange equations, with the receiver (3-D)
position and clock offset as the four unknown variables. Each equation
is an expression of the principle that the true range (the difference
between the pseudorange and the receiver clock offset) is equal to the
distance between the known satellite position and the unknown receiver
position. This principle is expressed below mathematically using the
same notation as Figure 1-10.
These are simplified versions of the equations actually used by
GPS receivers. A receiver also obtains corrections derived from the
navigation messages which it applies to the pseudoranges. These include
corrections for the satellite clock offset, relativistic effects,
ionospheric signal propagation delays. Dual frequency receivers can
measure the delay between the L1 and L2 P(Y)-codes, if available, to
calculate an ionospheric correction. Single frequency (either C/A-or
P(Y)-code) receivers use parameters transmitted in the navigation
message to be used in an ionospheric model. The receiver (3-D) velocity
and frequency offset are calculated using similar equations, using
deltaranges instead of pseudoranges.
The PVT calculations described here result in a series of individual
point solutions. For receivers that are required to provide a
navigation solution under dynamic conditions a smoothed or filtered
solution that is less sensitive to measurement noise is employed. One
of the most common types of filters used in GPS receivers is the Kalman
filter. Kalman filtering is described in detail in Chapter 9.
The rate at which GPS receivers calculate the PVT solution is governed
by their application. For flight control applications a 10 Hz rate is
required whereas in handheld equipment a fix may only be required once
every 4 to 5 seconds or at even longer intervals. A 1 Hz rate is
typical for many equipment. In this scenario pseudorange measurements
are typically only made every 4 to 5 seconds; pseudorange rate
measurements are made more
frequently and can be used to propagate the filter solution between
updates.
If a Kalman filter is used the measurements may be incorporated
independently
into the filter removing the requirement for symmetrical measurements
from
all channels. The filter also allows the solution to be extrapolated if
measurements are interrupted, or data is available from other
navigation
sensors.
A minimum of four satellites are normally required to be simultaneously
"in view" of the receiver, thus providing four pseudorange and four
deltarange measurements. Treating the user clock errors as unknowns
enable most receivers to be built with an inexpensive crystal
oscillator rather than an expensive precision oscillator or atomic
clock. Less than four satellites can be used by a receiver if time or
altitude are precisely known or if these
parameters are available from an external source.
GPS receivers perform initial position and velocity calculations using
an earth-centered earth-fixed (ECEF) coordinate system. Results may be
converted to an earth model (geoid) defined by the World Geodetic
System 1984 (WGS 84). WGS 84 provides a worldwide common grid system
that may be translated into local coordinate systems or map datums.
(Local map datums are a best fit to the local shape of the earth and
not valid worldwide.) For more details regarding WGS 84, refer to Annex
B. For more details regarding how a receiver uses WGS 84, refer to
"Technical Characteristics of the
Navstar GPS".
For navigation purposes, it is usually necessary for a GPS receiver to
output positions in terms of magnetic North rather than true North
as defined by WGS 84. For details regarding how the receiver calculates
the magnetic variation from true North, refer to "Technical
Characteristics of the Navstar GPS".
1.4.2.9 Degraded Operation and Aiding
During periods of high levels of jamming, the receiver may not be able
to maintain both code and carrier tracking. The receiver normally has
the capability to maintain code tracking even when carrier tracking is
no longer possible. If only code tracking is available, the receiver
will slew the locally generated carrier and code signals based on
predicted rather than measured Doppler shifts. These predictions are
performed by the receiver processor, which may have additional PVT
information available from an external aiding source. See Chapter 7 for
additional discussion of GPS receiver aiding.
CHAPTER 2: TYPES OF GPS RECEIVERS
AND THEIR INTENDED APPLICATIONS
2.1 GPS RECEIVER ARCHITECTURES
Modern military GPS receivers use predominantly a continuous satellite
tracking architecture. However, some receivers use alternative
architectures, either sequential or multiplex tracking to reduce
hardware complexity.
2.4 TIME TRANSFER RECEIVERS
One of the more common uses of GPS is for precise time dissemination
applications. Several manufacturers offer this type of equipment
commercially. These precise time GPS receivers need only one GPS
satellite for precise time dissemination if the receiver is stationary
on a precisely known location and the only "unknown" is its own clock
offset from GPS time and therefore from UTC. To obtain the necessary
precise position, the receiver either
receives it as an operator input or uses four satellites to determine
its
own position. These receivers typically include an internal oscillator
or
an optional external frequency source (rubidium or cesium). Whenever
the
receiver is tracking a satellite, it generates 1, 5, or 10 MHz
reference frequencies
that are synchronized to UTC time. If no satellites are visible, the
reference
frequencies are derived from the internal or external frequency source.
The
receivers can provide either stand-alone (uncoordinated) or coordinated
time-transfer
operations. In SPS receivers, use of SA will reduce the time and
position
accuracy available. The manufacturers of time transfer receivers claim
time
accuracies in the 20 to 50 nanoseconds range, but this accuracy
requires
algorithms that average pseudorange measurements over time (10 - 60
minutes).
A stand-alone PPS time receiver normally provides time accuracy in the
100
nanoseconds range. The advantage of having an external frequency source
interface
designed into the receiver is that the long term error in the frequency
source
can be adjusted when the receiver has satellites in view. A stationary
PPS
GPS receiver with a precise time and time interval (PTTI) interface
should
be able to provide UTC to an accuracy of 50 to 60 nanoseconds.
CHAPTER 4: GPS RECEIVER INTERFACES
AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT
4.3 PRECISE TIME AND TIME INTERVAL INTERFACE
4.3.1 Introduction
GPS is becoming recognized as the primary time dissemination system for
military and commercial applications. An example of a system which may
use time transfer from GPS is the calibration of atomic clocks.
4.3.2 Precise Time Inputs
A time input is used to reduce the uncertainty of the receivers
initial time estimate and thus reduce TTFF, or it may be used instead
of a satellite in the navigation solution.
The precise time input to a GPS receiver is accomplished by using a 1
pulse per second rate representing UTC one-second-rollover and a Binary
Code Decimal (BCD) time code describing the pulse per second time from
an atomic clock. The pulse input indicates the moment of the time to
UTC, and the BCD time code identifies what time it was at the UTC
one-second-rollover.
The MIL-STD-1553 PTTI Input Message time transfer mechanism uses the
same time rollover pulse input. However, instead of labeling the time
with a BCD time input, the HV supplies a PTTI input message via the
MIL-STD-1553 MUX bus to label the time epoch.
4.3.3 Precise Time Outputs
The primary function of these outputs is to calibrate an atomic
clock, or to support other systems that require precise time. The
outputs are 1 pulse per second or 1 pulse per minute to indicate the
one second or one minute rollover of UTC, and a BCD time code that
indicates the time at the rollover epoch (Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Day
of Year, Time Figure of Merit (TFOM)).
Another means of precise time transfer from the GPS receiver is
to use the 1 pulse per second output in conjunction with the PTTI
output message available on the MIL-STD-1553 multiplex bus.
We can note herein the use of MITICs to control SITICs and thus
confirmation of the TITI.
Chapter 11: Special Applications for Navstar GPS
11.1 INTRODUCTION
Navstar GPS is a positioning system that will be a definite force
enhancer in military operations. Since GPS will also be available to
civilian users and has the potential to enhance military operations
other
than weapon delivery, several special applica tions for GPS have been
developed.
This chapter will discuss four special applications already developed
to
indicate the variety of GPS uses. The four special applications
discussed
are as follows:
1. DGPS Applications
2. GPS used as an attitude reference system
3. Precise time and GPS
4. Orbit determination using GPS
11.4 PRECISE TIME AND GPS
11.4.1 Introduction
Precise time is important for a growing number of military, civilian,
and scientific applications. Precise time references accurate to a few
milliseconds or better have historically been complicated and costly to
obtain, but GPS will afford the means to do it very simply and
economically. Navstar GPS provides precise time, globally, to an
absolute accuracy of
approximately 200 nanoseconds (ns) relative to UTC (USNO).
(This figure and others given in 11.3 and its subsections are subject
to implementation factors and might be considered usual values; with
careful implementations and under circumstances, much better accuracies
are possible.)
11.4.2 Applications of Precise Time
Both scientific and civilian precise-time interests can be served by
GPS. Some examples of civilian/scientific applications are described
below:
1. Simultaneous observations of space objects from observatories
2. Use by national standards laboratories
3. Research into the theory of general relativity
4. Development and calibration of frequency standards
5. Use of Time Division Multiplexed (TDM) and other communications
disciplines requiring precise time coordination between sites.
11.4.3 Interrelationship Between Different Definitions of Time
A number of different time definitions will be described here.
11.4.3.1 Time Based on the Rotation of the Earth On Its Axis
There are several definitions of time based on the rotation of the
earth, but they are all interrelated ... .
1. Universal Time (UT)
UT is mean solar time on the Greenwich meridian. It is used in the
application of astronomical navigation.
2. Universal Time 0 (UT 0)
UT 0 is determined directly from astronomical observations. It is
non-uniform due to the irregular rotation of the earth on its axis and
to
polar motion.
3. Universal Time 1 (UT 1)
UT 1 is UT 0 corrected for polar motion and is therefore more uniform
than UT 0. UT 1 is the same as Greenwich Mean Time.
4. Universal Time 2 (UT 2)
UT 2 is UT 1 corrected for mean seasonal variations and is therefore
more
uniform than UT 1.
11.4.3.2 Atomic Time/UTC Time
Atomic time is based on quantified energy transitions within the
atom. The atomic second is defined as 9192631770 cycles of the cesium
resonance and is the unit of time used in International Systems of
Units
(SI). Atomic time is obtained practically by use of cesium beam clocks.
However, no practical clock can be considered perfect at deriving the
defined frequency. UTC is a type of atomic time maintained by the U.S.
Naval Observatory (USNO), and others. UTC is occasionally adjusted in
steps (leap seconds) to maintain agreement with UT-1 to within 0.9
seconds.
Leap seconds are necessary because of the effects on UT-1 of the
irregular
rotation of th e earth over time. The International Earth Rotation
Service
in Paris, France determines when step adjustments are necessary. A
number
of observatories/ laboratories maintain atomic clocks as very precise
time
references. They usually synchronize these clocks to UTC, which is the
commonly used reference time. UTC represents an average of time from 58
different laboratories around the world. Each major country maintains
its
own version of UTC and defines national standards of time. Therefore,
there
is no one "Coordinated Universal Time". Instead, there is an
International
Atomic Time (TAI), kept in Paris by the International Bureau of Weights
and Measures (BIPM), and several versions of UTC. The TAI is a weighted
average of the times kept by the 58 laboratories which cooperate with
BIPM to form this average. For the past few years, the majority of time
comparisons used to form TAI have been done using GPS. The difference
between TAI and the various national UTC time references are closely
monitored and are therefore well known. National UTC references will
therefore be steered to TAI when necessary and for GPS users, steering
of UTC (USNO)
will be experienced once every couple of years. For U.S. agencies, UTC
is
maintained by the U.S. Naval Observatory (USNO) in Washington, D.C. GPS
time is required by the U.S. DoD to be referenced to UTC (USNO).
11.4.3.3 GPS Time
The internal reference time used by the three segments (Space -,
Control- and User-Segment) in the GPS system is called GPS time. GPS
time
is a continuous time count, with no discontinuities, from the GPS
epoch.
GPS time is estimated and maintained by the MCS by estimating the
ensemble
satellite and monitor station time off sets. To aid USNO in providing a
stable and accurate reference to the system, an ensemble of cesium-beam
clocks is also maintained at the GPS Monitor Station that is collocated
with the MCS. As a Precise Time Reference Station, it maintains time
and rate very accurately traceable to UTC (USNO). It normally maintains
a UTC (USNO) reference to an accuracy of a few nanoseconds. GPS time
will normally be steered to within 30 nanoseconds of UTC (USNO) after
accounting for the leap seconds which have accumulated in UTC since the
GPS epoch of 0 hours 6 January 1980 (UTC). The remaining difference
between GPS time and UTC (USNO)
is transmitted in the NAV msgs from the satellites. The relationship
between
GPS time and UTC is:
GPS time = UTC time + DUTC time
where, DUTC time = Number of leap seconds + GPS-to-UTC bias
As of May 1995 the leap second difference between GPS and UTC is 10
seconds. The GPS receiver uses the NAV msg data to provide UTC (USNO)
time outputs.
11.4.4 Precise Time Dissemination from GPS
GPS satellites have highly stable atomic clocks onboard with a known or
predictable offset from GPS time. USNO monitors all the satellites when
in view of the USNO in Washington DC, U.S.A. and compares the GPS time
and UTC (USNO) time transmitted by the satellites with the (USNO)
Master
Clock. Based on this comparison USNO determines the accuracy of the
GPS/UTC
time information provided by each GPS satellite and transfers this
information to the MCS ... . This GPS to UTC time bias and drift
offsets, as well as the number of leap seconds, are uploaded in the
satellite almanac data message. This information is used in the GPS
receiver algorithms to determine UTC (USNO) time from GPS. The result
is a world-wide time reference system
for UTC (USNO) available to every user of GPS ... .
The absolute time accuracy available to the user depends on several
factors described in Table 11-1, but the relative time accuracy between
two GPS users can be much better than the absolute time accuracy. If
the stations simultaneously track the same GPS satellites for time
dissemination, then the effects of certain Control Segment and
satellite-induced errors on the relative time accuracy are much
reduced, and relative time accuracy can be as good as 10 -20 ns. Almost
all users employ local clocks or oscillators of some kind to satisfy
system requirements for long- and short-term accuracy and stability, or
to avoid the need for continuous updates from an external reference,
such as GPS. Slaving the clocks too tightly to GPS time would impart to
them the shorter-term instability associated with reception and
interpretation of GPS signals and with the instabilities previously
mentioned. Longer -term measurements that are required to obtain an
accurate rate
or frequency would not enjoy the short-term advantage of simultaneous
tracking, since over a period of time, most of the space and Control
Segment functions would effect the stability of the dissemination
function.
11.4.5 Time Transfer Using GPS
Time transfers (clock comparisons) may be made in a number of ways
using the GPS satellites. The time dissemination process described in
paragraph 11.4.4 is a "passive" method, in which the user acquires an
accurate
time reference without having to transmit timing signals or data. Other
ways that can provide more accurate comparisons are described in this
section.
11.4.5.1 Coordinated Simultaneous-View Time Transfer
In this method, a pair of stations simultaneously observes the same
satellite(s); then (through some communications medium) they exchange
readings of their local clock time against the time disseminated by
GPS.
The difference between these readings is quite accurately the
difference
between the stations' clocks. The satellite clock is primarily a
transfer
clock and does not directly affect the time transfer accuracy. This
method
might be used where the user clocks are required to maintain time or
frequency agreement more precisely than UTC can be disseminated through
GPS. The
method works particularly well when the participating clocks are
located
reasonably close together (within some hundreds of kilometers). The
method
can also substantially reduce the effects of S/A on time transfers made
with the C/A-code, because both ephemeris and ionospheric effects are
reduced.
Unless the time transfer is made with USNO or a UTC(USNO)-traceable
reference,
the result is relative rather than absolute time accuracy.
11.4.5.2 Coordinated Simultaneous -View Time Transfer with USNO
USNO uses a coordinated simultaneous-view method as shown in Figure
11-5, to provide more accurate UTC (USNO) to certain Precise Time
Stations within simultaneous-view range. Both USNO and the distant
observer track the same GPS satellite(s), derive UTC (USNO) from the
satellite's NAV msg and pseudorange measurements, and compare this time
with the time maintained by their local atomic clocks. USNO compares
UTC (USNO) derived from the GPS satellites with the USNO Master Clock.
Thus, USNO can deter mine the Control Segment and Satellite-induced
errors that the observer will have in his GPS-derived UTC(USNO). The
distant observer can then correct his GPS derived UTC (USNO) with
corrections received from USNO via a data link. Now the distant
observer can correct his clock very accurately to serve
as a local reference traceable to UTC (USNO). The time accuracies that
can
be obtained by this method are shown in Table 11-1. The Table 11-1
values
are valid for time transfer using C/A-code only when SA is switched
off.
Smoothing of the time measurements brings the error down to what can be
expected for a P-code receiver.
The errors due to ephemeris uncertainties and ionospheric delay
usually cancel out of if the two receivers are close to each other.
This
is because they have nearly the same line of sight to the satellites,
and the signals travel through the same part of the ionosphere. In some
cases where the two receivers are close to each other, the use of both
L1 and L2 to compensate for ionospheric delay will be less accurate
than
not correcting for ionospheric delay at all. This is due to the fact
that dual frequency com pensation for ionospheric delay is not perfect,
and use of the ionospheric delay broadcast by the satellite by both
parties
produces more accurate results. For most cases where characters per
second
is used for coordinated simultaneous -view time transfer, the average
of the values listed in Table 11-2 can be expected with distances of
hundreds
of kilometers between two receivers.
Compared with the uncoordinated simultaneous -view technique described
in paragraph 11.4.4, coordinated time transfers with USNO can provide
not only more accurate relative timing in the shorter term, but also
better absolute timing and better long -term stability for setting and
rating high -quality clocks.
To PageLinks
We thus can note that in the language used in this manual UT =
universal time, UTC = universal time coordinated, MCS = master control
station.
We therefore can note that where UT = universal time, then UT =
AT/absolute time, and, therefore, the developers of the GPS were and
are aware of the necessity for establishing UT/AT for time coordination
among ground stations, satellites, and GPS receivers.
The MCS/master control station is obviously an MITIC controlling SITICs:
MCS/Master Control Station = MITIC/Master Invariable Time-Inerval Clock
Thus, by the direct statement of the use of MCS in the GPS we have
confirmation of the prediction that either Design A/Type A MASSAITICs
or Design B/Type B MITICs controlling SITICs will be used for
spacecraft/satellite/GPS time coordination/establishment of UT/AT.
ANNEX A: GLONASS: RUSSIA'S
EQUIVALENT NAVIGATION SYSTEM
A.1 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
Similarly to the US TRANSIT, Russia operates CICADA, since the 1970's,
the system consists of dual frequency VHF signals (150 MHz and 400 MHz)
from satellites in near polar, low earth orbit. As the US has built up
the Navstar GPS to replace TRANSIT, the Russians have developed an
equivalent system, the Global Navigation Satellite Service, GLONASS.
GLONASS uses a similar architecture to GPS for most components of its
system. Users navigate with GLONASS in the same manner as GPS.
The system saw its origins in the mid 1970s at the Scientific
Production Association of Applied Mechanics (NPO PM) a developer of
military satellite in Kransnoyarsk-26. Since 1982 a range of GLONASS
satellites have been launched three at a time, from the Tyuratam space
centre. Although there was some doubt concerning the Russians'
intentions in the early 1990's, however several statements concerning
the systems future particularly to ICAO, and launches during 1994 and
1995 have confirmed GLONASS will reach full operation by late 1995.
GLONASS is owned and operated by Military Space Forces of the Russian
Ministry of Defence. The Russian Institute of Radio Navigation and Time
in St Petersburg designed and supports the synchronization of master
clock systems, maintains satellite and Earth based time and frequency
standards and develops receivers.
A.2 PURPOSE OF GLOBAL SATELLITE NAVIGATION SYSTEMS
GLONASS as Navstar GPS provides precision position fixing and time
reference systems for world wide continuous use. An observer makes
time-of-arrival measurements simultaneously to four satellites and by
using the
received data to compute the position of the satellites solves the four
range equations for his three unknown position coordinates and time.
It is presumed the primary purpose of GLONASS is similarly to GPS for
weapon system navigation and guidance. However as with GPS the wide
interest in the use of satellite navigation systems has resulted in
parts of the system being offered for international civil use.
A.4 MONITOR AND CONTROL SUBSYSTEM
As for GPS, GLONASS is controlled and monitored by a complex ground
system. Data defining satellite position, system time and navigation
message is uploaded to the satellites every 24 hrs with the satellite
timing synchronized on every orbit, Ref 3.
The GLONASS monitor and control segment consists of:
- Ground control centre (GCC) Moscow
- Central synchronizer (CS) Moscow
- TT&C stations Saint Petersburg, Yeniseisk, Komsomolsk-on-Amur
- navigation signal phase control system (PCS) Moscow
- quantum-optical station (QOS), Komsomolsk-on-Amur
- navigation field control equipment (NFCE) Moscow, Komsomolsk-on-Amur
The monitoring and control subsystem operates autonomously and receives
the data of Earth rotation parameters, corrections to the system time
relative to Russian Time & Frequency Standard (UTC SU) externally.
We can note that the Russians were also using MITICs in the GCC/Ground
Control Centre/Central Synchronizer to control SITICs for their GLONASS
system.
We thus have from the Russians confirmation of the TITI by their use of
Russian MITICs to control Russian SITICs for UT/time
coordination/synchronization.
To PageLinks
The 1971
Hafele-Keating Experiment
To PageLinks
The 1971 Hafele-Keating experiment ...
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.htm
... provides the conditions under which ITICs can be confirmed to be
a reality.
"During October, 1971, four cesium
atomic beam clocks were flown on regularly scheduled commercial jet
flights around the world twice, once eastward and once westward, to
test Einstein's theory of relativity with macroscopic clocks. From the
actual flight paths of each trip, the theory predicted that the flying
clocks, compared with reference clocks at the U.S. Naval Observatory,
should have lost 40+/-23 nanoseconds during the eastward trip and
should have gained 275+/-21 nanoseconds during the westward trip ...
Relative to the atomic time scale of the U.S. Naval Observatory, the
flying clocks lost 59+/-10 nanoseconds during the eastward trip and
gained 273+/-7 nanosecond during the westward trip, where the errors
are the corresponding standard deviations. These results provide an
unambiguous empirical resolution of the famous clock "paradox" with
macroscopic clocks."
J.C. Hafele and R. E. Keating, Science 177, 166 (1972)
In the Hafele-Keating experiment, three sets of atomic clocks were
synchronized (time-coordinated) and all clocks were therefore using the
same time-interval [TI].
One set of clocks was placed aboard a westbound jet airliner, another
set was placed aboard an eastbound set airliner, and thus both sets of
airborne clocks were accelerated and decelerated during the normal
flight routines of the airliners and then returned to the Earth, where
their readouts (time counts/time measurements) were compared to the
readouts of the clocks which remained on Earth.
In this experiment, the Earth was one reference frame, and each
airliner, because of its acceleration and altitude, was another
reference frame,
in analogy with Einstein's gedankenexperiment (thought
experiment/intuition) in which a railway embankment was one reference
frame and a moving railway carriage was another reference frame (see
Relativity
by Albert Einstein, pp. 17-25):
Earth = Railway Embankment [K
Reference Frame]
Airliner = Railway Carriage [K' Reference Frame]
When the readouts of the accelerated airborne clocks were compared to
the readouts of the non-accelerated Earth-bound clocks, the accelerated
airborne clocks' readouts were uniformly lesser than the
non-accelerated Earth-bound clocks' readouts, an indication that time
had been dilated, and a confirmation of relativity, which predicted
time-dilation for accelerated/decelerated clocks.
We note that the determination of time-dilation is conducted in the
originating reference frame and not by any method whereby observers in
one reference frame observe objects/events in another reference frame.
By the use of the single originating reference frame Lorentz
relativistic transformation problems are eliminated.
The clocks used for the Hafele-Keating experiment were clocks whose
time-intervals (TIs) were variable time-intervals (VTIs) thus the
clocks themselves were variable time-interval clocks (VTICs) whose
time-intervals were variable in duration, in time, when subjected to
changes of velocity (speed and direction) and/or gravity. When the
air-borne VTICs were accelerated, their TIs/VTIs were lengthened, their
RoOs were slowed, and their counting of TIs/VTIs
was decreased, their readouts/time
counts/time-measurements/face-readings
decreased, with the result that their readouts were different from and
less
than the readouts of the Earth-bound/non-accelerated VTICs.
If invariable time-interval clocks (ITICs—either
motion-sensing/self-adjusting invariable time-interval clocks
[MSSAITICs] or master invariable time-interval clocks [MITICs]
controlling slave invariable time-interval clocks [SITICs]) were used
in a replication of the Hafele-Keating experiment, then the prediction
is that upon their return to the Earth the airborne accelerated ITICs
would show the same/identical readouts as the non-accelerated
Earth-bound ITICs, and, thus, time would not be dilated.
Again, the use of the single originating reference frame eliminates the
Lorentz relativistic transformation problems.
What is of critical importance herein is the fact that machines which
are subject to changes of their rates of operation [RoOs] caused by
accelerations and/or decelerations were used, and the predicted and
observed changes
of their RoOs is supposed to be proof of time dilation predicted by
Einstein in his theory of relativity, and, thus, in the Haefele-Keating
experiments there was in fact an observed change of RoOs in the
airborne clocks and, thus, the predictions of time-dilation appeared to
have been confirmed,
and, thus, the relativistic theory of time was supposed to have been
physically verified.
The question was never raised of what would happen to machines whose
RoOs were adjusted to compensate for the predicted and expected changes
of RoOs caused by accelerations/decelerations. The predictions of the
Operational Physics Theory of Time [OpPhysToT] suggest that when
airborne ITICs, as
MITICs<->SITICs, are used instead of VTICs that the face-readings
of the airborne and therefore accelerated/decelerated ITICs would be
the
same as similar Earthbound ITICs or VTICs which have identical TIs. To
date
an experiment to confirm/disconfirm the OpPhysToT has not been
conducted.
The OpPhysToT has been confirmed by the use of an Earthbound master
clock [MITICs] which control earthbound slave clocks [SITICs] which
function
as relays of the master clock for the control of spaceborne slave
clocks
[SITICs] in satellites in the US GPS navigational
system, and by the similar use of and earthbound master clock
controlling
other Earthbound slave clocks controlling spaceborne slave clocks in
satellites
in the Russian GLONASS nav system.
To PageLinks
Radio Clocks
To PageLinks
We also have confirmation of the existence and usage of radio clocks
which either control other clocks or otherwise are used as time
references.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_clock
Radio clock.
A radio clock is a clock that is synchronized by a time code
transmitted by a radio transmitter connected to a time standard such as
an atomic clock.
Terrestrial time signals
Radio clocks synchronized to terrestrial time signals can usually
achieve an accuracy of around 1 millisecond relative to the time
standard, generally limited by uncertainties and variability in radio
propagation.
Time signals that can be used as references for radio clocks include:
* the WWV, WWVB and WWVH radio stations in the United States
* the CHU radio station in Canada
* the DCF77 radio station in Germany
* the MSF radio station in the United Kingdom
* the JJY radio station in Japan
Time signal radio stations in general have the following attributes:
* they refer their broadcast frequency to the frequency standard
* they broadcast seconds 'pips' to identify the start of second
intervals
* they also broadcast time codes as a way of identifying seconds
intervals
Loran-C time signals may also be used for radio clock synchronization,
by augmenting their highly accurate frequency transmissions with
external measurements of the offsets of LORAN navigation signals
against time standards.
GPS clocks
Many modern radio clocks use the GPS satellite positioning system to
provide more accurate time than can be obtained from these terrestrial
radio stations. These GPS clocks combine time estimates from multiple
satellite
atomic clocks with error estimates maintained by a network of ground
stations.
Because they compute the time and position simultaneously from readings
from several sources, GPS clocks can automatically compensate for
line-of-sight
delay and many radio propagation defects, and can achieve
sub-microsecond
accuracy under ideal conditions.
To PageLinks
Summary
To PageLinks
Summary: The use of MITICs and SITICs confirms the
existence of ITICs and the existence and practical usage of ITIs and
thereby
confirms the TITI, the Theory of Invariable Time-Intervals.